|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ..:: Hot News: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sunday, 11.18.2012, 09:15pm (GMT+1) Edmund
Burke once wrote that: An event has
happened, upon which it is difficult to speak, and impossible to be silent. War
crimes are such events. 2001-Present: The American-led-NATO
assault upon and occupation of Afghanistan has witnessed numerous infractions of
internationally-recognized statutes upholding human rights and protections
during the prosecution of war. Grisly photographs depicting American military personnel
posing with the decapitated remains of mostly Afghan civilians, non-combatants killed indiscriminately in raids have surfaced
among the military units as macabre’ souvenirs and subsequently circulated on
the internet and in the print media. Of late, human rights councils have
expressed concern over American detention and interrogation practices in both
the Iraq and Afghan theatres of war. Practices that have led to inhuman
excesses known as ‘waterboarding’ sleep deprivation and other forms of torture
proscribed under international decorum, covenant and law. As
we have come to realize however, members of a super-power, in particular those
of high rank or station are rarely if ever investigated, indicted, and brought
to trial for the most heinous crimes known to man. Recently in an attempt to
control the narrative and posit the war in justified terms and to thereby assuage
public outrage, charges have been filed against a small number of American
soldiers of enlisted rank for such unconscionable acts. Such charges are
generally filed against only those of low rank and standing. However, it is
indisputable that the architects of war are the supreme criminals under the
law, but in a predictable mockery of justice or double standard, said
architects are generally of high office and therefore are never brought to
task. With the publication of photographs depicting obvious war crimes and in a
recent spate of international conscience however some European countries have
of late cited former Bush administration officials to include the former
president for violations of codified war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan and
have issued arrest warrants addressing specificities. To enforce such warrants,
George W, Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and other
administration officials could only be arrested were they to travel to these specific
international- jurisdictional venues. As such warrants however are not
enforceable in the United States, notwithstanding the fact that war crimes are
in violation of both national and international statute under U.S. law, and as the
United States appears as signatory to numerous international treaties and covenants
prohibiting the execution of war crimes. As a powerful member of the United Nations
with veto power, and in an obvious double –standard and mockery of justice, it
has as yet to materialize for the U.N. to investigate and or prosecute the
U.S., the most powerful Member for numerous violations to include the supreme
crime under the statutes, ’War of Aggression.’ While the Allies vigorously
prosecuted Nazi war criminals in the wake of World War II, both Russia and the
Unites States have been granted what appears immunity from prosecution for war
crimes by the United Nations Human Rights Council and the International
Criminal Court…the so-called watchdogs for human rights. 1979-1989: During the Soviet invasion
and occupation of Afghanistan, and in the immediate aftermath, numerous war
crimes were committed by the Soviet 40th Army of occupation and factions
vying for power following the Soviet withdrawal in 1989. Most violations were
committed by the military wings of Afghanistan’s minority factions who had
allied themselves with the Soviet occupiers. The following account of acts of
depravity are graphic, gut-wrenching and without doubt, ‘difficult upon which
to speak’, yet, of which Edmund Burke opined and wrote so eloquently, ‘it is
impossible to be silent.’ War Crimes in Kabul: In
April of 1992, Massoud’s intelligence organs took over the structures of the
KhAD in Kabul and founded a new secret police, the ‘National Security.’(1) In
addition to prison camps in the Panjsher Valley, they maintained a
secret-service prison in Kabul where prisoners were tortured under
investigative arrest (Danesch, p. 37).
The new apparatus is known as the Rijasat-e-Tahqiq
(Office of Investigation), and rumor has it that five thousand agents and
operatives are active throughout Afghanistan (Danesch, p. 37). A young man who
had been under ‘investigative arrest’ for sixty days told of being crammed with
thirty other prisoners into a tiny underground cell, without water or sanitary
facilities, before he was transferred to a labor camp in the Panjsher. He was
blindfolded for weeks, beaten, sodomized with a broken bottle, kicked, and
tortured with thumb screws. He now lives in constant pain from the internal
injuries he was forced to endure. (2) A
prominent Afghan journalist, Nawid Fraidoon tells of the brutal treatment of
women, and of a mass execution in Kabul by Massoud’s security service: (Fraidoon, p.12A) When night fell, in one of the
buildings where eighty women were, many guards entered and mass-rape started.
By flashing torches the victims were selected and raped on the spot. There were
terrible cries, women and girls were also taken away and never seen again.
These mean acts were repeated night after night. There was no sanitation and
soon disease started. There was no food for the first three days, and very
little afterwards. Within two days forty babies had died in their mother’s arms
in the confinements. The women were kept there for many weeks and the number of
deaths increased. Babies died every day, up to fifteen a day. ‘The
tale is always the same.’ Fraidoon said. ‘Starvation, overcrowding, brutality
and death conditions, which make Pul-i-Charki mild by comparison.’ A chilling
account of the terror and inhumanity extant under the government of Rabbani and
Massoud follows from the notes of Afghan journalist Nawid Fraidoon: (Fraidoon p.13A), (3) Later, a new interrogator, one I had
not seen before, walked down the roadway holding a long, sharp knife. I could
not make out their words, but he spoke to the pregnant woman and she answered.
What happened next makes me nauseous to think about. I can only describe it in
the briefest of terms: He cut the clothes off her body, slit he stomach, and
took the baby out. I turned away but there was no escaping the sound of her
agony, the screams that slowly subsided into whimpers and after far too long
lapsed into merciful silence of death. The killer walked calmly past me holding
the fetus by its neck. When he got to the house, just within my range of
vision, he tied a string around the fetus and hung it from the eaves with the others,
which were dried and black and shrunken. (3) Interviews
conducted in Kabul in November 1997, further corroborate the horror under the
direction of the leadership of Ali Mazari’s Hezb-i-Wahdat,
Dostum’s Jumbish and Massoud’s Shura-i-Nizar respectively. A Wahdat prisoner, captured by the
Taliban, recounts a common saying amongst the Hazara during the battle for
control of Kabul: (4) If you kill one Sunni you will go to
Heaven, if you kill two Sunni you will reach a higher place in Heaven, if you
kill three Sunni and pee in his mouth you will receive a special house in
Heaven. (Nawid
Fraidoon, 13-15 A) They died by a means which was
carefully selected among the most poignant that man can suffer: They were burnt
alive not infrequently by a slow fire. They were burnt alive after their
constancy had been tried by excruciating agonies that minds fertile in torture
can devise. In 1994 alone, and only God knows what took place prior to that,
more than 400 intellectuals were abused and murdered by the Rijisat-e-Tahqiq,
teachers, professors, actors, film makers, accused by Massoud of collaborating
with the enemy. (Danesch, p.38) (5), (6) Notes: (1) According
to Dr. M. Hassan Sharq, when Massoud, in collusion with Communist bankers and
government officials, seized the Bank of Kunduz in 1988, 1.4 billion Afghanis
were expropriated from the bank by armed Shura-i-Nizar
personnel. Five- hundred-ten million Afghanis were earmarked for the
expansion of KhAD. This money was to become the genesis of Massoud’s secret police
structure that would later terrorize the citizens of Kabul. (Phone interview in
Boston between Dr. M. Hassan Sharq and Bruce Richardson,
16 November 1996). (2) Professor
Abdul Shookor Rashad, Academy of Sciences, Kabul, informed us during an
interview (30 October 1997) of the horror and moral depravity associated with
Massoud’s intelligence services. ‘People were forced to eat the flesh of the
dead and their own excrement,’ he said. He also informed us that during the
same period the Hazara beheaded their prisoners with red-hot instruments to
induce involuntary convulsion and thereby provide unfathomable, grotesque
entertainment: The Hazara gleefully
referred to their headless victims as the ‘dancing dead.’ Translation: Afghan
journalist Sayed Noorulhaq Husseini. (3) Citations: ‘Afghanistan’s
Intoxication with Violence’, “Swiss Review of World Affairs”, Mustafa Danesch,
October 1996, pp.37-38. (4) An
interview: Bruce G. Richardson, Professor Abdul Shookor Rashad, Afghan
journalist Sayed Noorulhaq Husseini, Kabul, 30 October 1997. (5) ‘Ethnic Violence in Kabul’, “The “Dispatch”,
Nawid Fraidoon, 9 September 1996, pp. 12A-13A. (6) Dawat, ‘Top Afghans tied to ‘90s
Carnage, Researchers say’, Rod Norland, 23 July, 2012, Criminals named as
complicit in the shocking slaughterhouse expose are: Fahim, Khalili, Noor, Akhund,
Khirkalua, Massoud, Dostum and Mohaqiq. A question from international jurists based
on this report and article arises, ‘Why don’t we put their international
backers on trial?
Though
extremely difficult for most to comprehend, let alone discuss…war crimes
constitute a dark subject and abject-inhumanity in the face of which ‘it is
impossible to remain silent.’ **Portions of the preceding
text previously published in (‘Afghanistan,
Ending the Reign of Soviet Terror’, Bruce G. Richardson, 1996-1998, pp. 79-81). Bruce G. Richardson, 11/2012
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||